Photograph: IRS Tax Form being filled out.  Photo credit: Ken Teegarden | CC2.0, Flickr

 

Introduction

This page has resources on various taxes, proposed and implemented. They list arguments for and against, paying special attention to taxes as at least potentially constructive and beneficial. This view coincides with the traditional Christian moral argument that human community comes before private property, so taxation is not in principle immoral. Nor is it intrinsically theft, as libertarians argue. Taxation funding public investment is a way to express the value of community — especially investment in all our children. The principle of meritocracy is violated when we allow inequalities among our children: What have children done to deserve all the advantages or disadvantages they inherit? It's not fair. Furthermore, in the United States, credit is assigned to people unfairly: Goods that are funded by taxpayers and created by the government and/or the military — technology, infrastructure, medicine, etc. — become privatized for private gain. Almost every component of Apple’s iPhone, for example, was developed by the military and funded by the public. Ideally, the public should share credit and a 50% ownership stake in the patents and profits. It's not fair to overlook that. So, given that we do not structure our patent and ownership laws in this way, taxation is a second-best way to express the fact that the public deserves credit for our past investment. The issues covered below focus on philosophical and historical issues related to taxes on individuals and households. See Corporate Taxes for more on corporate taxes.

 

Messages and Resources

Mako Nagasawa, John Locke’s Theology of Private Property, edited by Grace Tien and Maria Eugenia Funes, Religion and Racial Capitalism. Palgrave MacMillan, 2025.

American libertarians and private property absolutists appeal to John Locke, remembered as an English political philosopher. Locke originally positioned himself, however, as a biblical scholar and theologian. As such, Locke departed from Christian tradition. I argue the relationship between Locke’s political philosophy and the Bible is that of a parasite and its host. Christian leaders prior to Locke believed that the earth is the Lord’s, the fruit of the earth belongs to all, and the political community could modify property in various ways because it was ethically and chronologically prior to private property. Locke, however, argued that individuals first create private property by enclosing land and laboring on it, then bring their private properties into political society, which was meant by God to defend individual property rights. He thereby defended both the English Revolution of 1688 and also English colonialism in the Americas.

 
 

Christian Restorative Justice, Business, and Economics: Topics:

Christian Restorative Justice Critique of the Right: Domestic Policy Topics:

Critique of the Right: Philosophical Influences: